MYROYALS PHOTOS
HOLLYWOOD FASHION 2014
Showing posts with label royal finances. Show all posts
Showing posts with label royal finances. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Royal History: The Issue with the Royal Family

In 1992, the British Royal Family was stormed by one crisis after another, as such, Queen Elizabeth II aptly called that year “annus horribilis.” Suzanne Cassidy in The Arts, The Royalty Issue (1991) succinctly wrote about the issue of the Royal Family (adapted from The Americana Annual, Grolier Incorporated, c1992).

The British Royal Family. Image: MyDaily.co.uk

During her visit to the United States in May 1991, Queen Elizabeth II was received enthusiastically nearly everywhere she went. It must have been a relief, for trouble and dissent has been brewing at home. In Britain, loyalty to “queen and country” remained strong, but it was no longer an unquestioned loyalty and indeed it was a matter of some contention that it ever had been.

During the 1991 Gulf War, the right-of-center Sunday Times lambasted some members of the royal family for not doing enough for the war effort; this was so small slight, for the queen is officially head ot the armed services. Some of the family members, railed the newspaper, “paraded a mixture of upper-class decadence and insensitivity which disgusts the public and demeans the monarchy.”

The Tax Issue

In February a poll conducted by Numbers Market Research for the Independent found that 79 percent of those polled believed that the queen should pay tax. In June author Phillip Hall revealed that contents of his new book, which asserted that contrary to the widely held belief that the monarch never has paid taxed, both Queen Victoria and Edward VII paid income tax; total exception was not secured until the reign of King George VI, the current Queen’s father. Hall’s assertions fueld an already raging debate about the queen’s untaxed private income, which one modest estimate put at about L20 mn (about $34 mn) per year. (The total private wealth of the Windsors, on which no income tax is paid, had been estimated at $10.73 bn by Fortune magazine).
Noting that the Japanese emperor and the Swedish monarch paid tax, Liberal Democratic Parliamentarian Simon Hughes pressed for a bill that would abolish the queen’s tax free status. Speaking on television, Lord St. John of Fawsley, former Conservative leader of the House of Commons and a devoted royalist, admitted that the queen’s tax-exempt status was “not totally accepted in the modern world,” and “may be modified at some time in the future.”

The Overview

Just as troubling, perhaps, were the results of a Gallup pole for the Daily Telegraph newspaper in July that found that 22 pc of those questioned said that Britain did not need a royal family; of that percentage, 36 pc was under the age of 25. The same poll showed that 51 pc of those questioned believed that the royal family did not provide “a good example of family life”; in other words, the royals were failing in one of their prime duties. The poll reflected not just fears about the family relations among the many peripheral royals, but concerns about the relationship between the heir to the throne and his wide. The couple, the prince and princess of Wales, marked their tenth wedding anniversary on July 29, amid unconfirmed but persistent reports that their marriage was in trouble. Prince Charles could lose his claim to the throne if there were a divorce, a circumstance the crown might not withstand.

Some expressed their belief that the demise of the crown would be no bad thing, arguing that Prime Minister John Major’s professed aim of a “classless society” never would be achieved until the crown was retired to history. Republicans proposed that the monarch be divested of all constitutional powers; at present, the sovereign is head of the Church of England and head of state of 13 Commonwealth countries. These, however, remained minority views. Britons may want the queen to be taxed, but a relative few wish for the crown to lose its status altogether. (Video: Youtube.com/Paulo Carvalho)



Thursday, September 26, 2013

Grand Duchess Augusta of Mecklenburg-Strelitz Loses English Pension

Princess Augusta of Cambridge, Grand Duchess
of Mecklenburg-Strelitz. Image: Wikimedia
September 18, 1914 - A special cable to the New York Times from London can reveal that the British Government has ceased providing the Dowager Grand Duchess Augusta of Mecklenburg-Strelitz with her $15,000-annuity. The Grand Duchess is a member of the British Royal Family, an aunt of Queen Mary, a cousin to Queen Victoria and a grand daughter of King George III. By marriage, she became a German subject.

The British Government made it known that no British money will ever reach the enemy's country.
Questions have been raised in the Parliament since "the payment arpose out of a contract made before the war begun." However, David Lloyd George, Chancellor of the Exchequer, announced that "payments had been suspended" already.

The Dowager Grand Duchess of Mecklenburg-Strelitz was born Princess Augusta of Cambridge in 1822. She is the second child and elder daughter of Adolphus Frederick, Duke of Cambridge, youngest son of King George III. In 1843, she married Frederick, Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz.

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Royal History: Prince Arthur Inherits Mother's Fortune

London, August 3, 2013

The will of the Duchess of Connaught, who died last March, revealed that she disposed a property worth L125,615 ($628,655), reports The New York Times. Princess Margaret, Crown Princess of Sweden, receives L25,000, while Princess Patricia is bequaethed L50,000. The residue goes to her only son, Prince Arthur of Connaught.



The Royal Blogger


Christian George Acevedo is a book worm, mentor, and scholar of wide-ranging interests. He has authored hundreds of articles for various websites, and his expertise ranges from online marketing and finance to history, entertainment and many more. Follow him on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, LinkedIn, Pinterest and Tumblr. Contact Christian at powerwordsonlinewriting@gmail.com.

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Royal History: The Duchess of Cambridge's estate

Princess Augusta of Hesse-Kassel,  Duchess of
Cambridge. Image: FlickR 

June 10, 1889 - The New World revealed that the estate of the late Duchess of Cambridge was estimated at around 220,000 pounds. She left 17,500 each to her grandchildren, the daughter and son of the Duke and Duchess of Teck. She also bequeathed them her savings, estimated at 50,000 pounds. Meanwhile, her collection of china and miniatures are bequeathed to Gloucester House, while her younger daughter, Princess Mary, received her carriages and wine. To her son in law, she left 5,000 pounds, "which has greatly helped to assuage his ruined feelings about the funeral arrangements." The residue of her estate is to be divided equally between her two daughters, Princess Mary and Princess Augusta, Grand Duchess of Mecklenburg-Strelitz. The sisters are also charged of paying certain bequests, although the Grand Duchess herself has volunteered to do so. However, the advances made by the Duke and Duchess of Teck are to be charged against their share of inheritance.



The Duchess also left Lady Geraldine Somerset and a certain Signor Tosti each with a 300-pound annual pension. Minor bequests are also provided to a number of individuals. It is believed that the Duke and Duchess of Connaught will occupy her apartments in St. James' Palace, while her son, the Duke of Cambridge will take Kew Cottage.

The Duchess of Cambridge was born Princess Augusta of Hesse-Kassel on July 25, 1797. In 1818, she married Prince Adolphus, Duke of Cambridge, youngest son of King George III.


About the Author

Christian George Acevedo is a librarian, mentor, and scholar of wide-ranging interests. He has authored hundreds of articles for various websites, and his expertise ranges from online marketing and finance to history, entertainment and many more. Follow him on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, LinkedIn, Pinterest and Tumblr. Contact Christian at powerwordsonlinewriting@gmail.com.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Belgian royals to start paying taxes: What a great gift to birthday boy King Albert

Belgian Royal Family to start paying taxes. Image credit: Almanach de Gotha
Wednesday, June 5 – Happy birthday, King Albert! And his subjects in the government just gave him the best birthday gift ever—taxing his family member.

Finally, Belgium’s royals will have to pay taxes. Since the kingdom was granted independence in 1830, not a single member of the royal family has contributed a cent to the state coffers. Now, that is going to change.  

The coalition government has already approved the reform.

Expactica.com reports His Majesty, however, receives an annual tax-free allowance of 11.5 million euros ($15 million). This exemption has been possible because the constitution any rules for the reigning royal to be altered.

However, the other members of the king’s family will be hard-hit by this household reforms, including his children and his sister-in-law, Queen Fabiola.

Crown Prince Philippe, who receives receives around 923,000 euros a year, will have to adjust to a reduced circumstances. Under the new law, he will only receive a gross salary of 180,000 euros. And that could dwindle further after tax. However, any amount paid for staff and meeting household expenses in relation to their job as working royals shall be tax exempt, although the government will still keep a scrutinizing look at their accounts.
The king’s younger children, Princess Astrid and PrinceLaurent, will each receive a gross salary 90,000 euros.

Meanwhile, the king’s frail and wheelchair-bound sister-in-law, Queen Fabiola, window of King Baudoin, saw her annual stipend slashed from 1.4 million euros to 923,000 euros.

The dowager queen was criticized lately after she decided to set up a private foundation that will take charge in disbursing her estate to her nephews and for Catholic charities upon her death. However, critics were quick to point out that the foundation is actually intended to funnel the funds to her Spanish relatives so she could avoid paying 70 percent death duties currently implemented in Belgium.

The recent rules however provided that the surviving spouse of a sovereign will only receive an amount equal to two-thirds of what an heir to the throne receives for 10 years. Afterwards, the amount will be slashed to just half of it.

In the future, the government will only pay for the allowance of the heir to the throne.

You might also want to read:



Friday, February 15, 2013

Royal history: British royal family's financial constraints


Jan. 21, 1936, London - The Royal Family which receives approximately $2.7 mn a year from Parliament is hard-pressed, reports The United Press. The amount is not enough to cover the cost of the Court and has to be subsidized by the Prince of Wales' Duchy of Cornwall and the King's own Duchy of Lancaster, which yields $285,000 a year. 


Here is detail of annual Civil list:

King

Privy Purse - $489,000
Household salaries - $559,000
House expenses - 858,000
Repairs and maintenance - 100,000
Royal bounty - 58500
unappropriated - 36,000

Royal Family
Duke of York - 119,000
Duke of Gloucester - 119000
Duke of Kent - 119000
Princess Royal - 28500

The Privy Purse however incurred deficit many times over.

1919 - $116,000
1920 - 218000
1921 - 257000

King George V eventually decided to cut his civil list by 260,000 a year when England hit a slump after the Depression. 

Royal history: Queen Victoria’s wealth estimated at $100,000,000

Queen Victoria leaves a huge fortune

Earlier, we have read about Queen Victoria’s will, which specified how much was left to whom. The Jan. 22, 1901 issue of The Boston Globe estimates that Queen Victoria's wealth by the time of her death was around $100 million. In fact, the late Queen-Empress was the first British sovereign to bequeath a "private fortune" to her family. "All her predecessors upon the throne bequeathed to their successor nothing but debts," which was paid by Parliament upon their death.


In 1861 Prince Albert, the Prince Consort, died. He willed $2.3 million to Her Majesty. Nield, the notorious miser, left the bulk of his estate also to Her Majesty, amounting to $2.5 mn. The Queen received $1,925,000 in Parliamentary annuity. She saved $300,000 a year from this, and $250,000 more after the prince consort's death. The Duchy of Lancaster also supplemented her income by as much as $300,000 a year. Her wise investments in real estate, New York skycrapers and other properties all "helped her pennies grow" to centimillions.

A January 26 article in Spoake-Review, as dispatched from Cowes, prospected as how Her Majesty’s enormous fortune will be disposed. While Queen Victoria’s will was “opened and examined yesterday by the duly appointed authorities,” its content was not made public, however. The authorities were also mum about the extent of Her Majesty’s private fortune. The Queen has drafted a will early in her reign, which was altered several times, as children grandchildren “were born and as estates rapidly advanced in value.” Her will was last updated in 1896.

It was predicted that Princess Henry of Battenberg would be her mother’s “principal beneficiary.” It was even prospected that she might become the owner of “Osborne House and the whole estate surrounding it.” That the “the Duke of Connaught and his children, will also receive large portion of the fortune,” with Balmoral House to be passed on to this favorite son of Her Majesty’s, including adjacent estates.
It was also speculated that the Queen’s grandchildren, particularly the two children of the late Duke of Albany, will benefit from their grandmother’s estate.

The Queen's second daughter, Princess Christian of Holstein, who does not have a fortune of her own, was also expected to be “legally provided for.”

Meanwhile, Edward VII, as king “will be amply provided for by the country,” while the duke of York and would-be prince of Wales, who is about to enjoy a substantial income from the duchy of Cornwall and will be the prince of Wales, might not receive that much from the Queen.

But not all these speculations are true. King Edward received the bulk of her mother’s fortune. Beatrice did not inherit the Osborne estate. Rather, two small houses were willed to her (the King decided to dedicate Osborne to the nation, much to Princess Beatrice’s disapproval). Princess Christian, Princess Louise, Prince Arthur, and Beatrice each received $700,000. Prince Arthur did not inherit Balmoral. It, too, passed to King Edward. The dowager Duchess of Albany and her two children were amply provided for. 

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Prince Michael of Kent writes off £750,000 losses

Prince and Princess Michael of Kent

After years of reported losses, Prince and Princess Michael of Kent have finally decided to write off the debts of Cantium Services, the umbrella firm that handles their commercial activities. Telegraph online reports that according to Mandrake, Prince Michael, a cousin to Queen Elizabeth II, "has  written off £750,000 in losses" of his firm. The company's capital was also reduced, from  from one million shares, with a nominal value of £1 each, to 250,000. The couple owns the company's entire stocks.


Last financial year, Cantium Services posted a profit of £148,755. The company specializes in offering "international commercial advice." It was revealed by Company Check that as of the 2012 financial period, the company's net worth was valued at £455,189.

The Prince was hounded by intrigue when, last August, reports surfaced that Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky has given the prince £320,000 in six years' time to finance the cost of maintaining the couple's household.

“The original donation came about because Mr Berezovsky has a high regard for the Prince, and, in particular, the work of the foundation which he set up in Russia in 2004 to promote heritage, culture and health,” said one of Prince Michael's close friends.

Prince and Princess Michael are the only members of the British Royal Family not to perform official duties, although they carry out their own activities in support of numerous charities. The couple does not receive Civil List payments, too. Since 2009, they have been paying £120,000 in rent for their five-bedroom apartment in Kensington Palace.

“Prince Michael is grateful that there was a positive outcome to last year’s trading," Prince Michael's spokesman told Telegraph.


About the Author

Christian George Acevedo is a librarian, mentor, and scholar of wide-ranging interests. He has authored hundreds of articles for various websites, and his expertise ranges from online marketing and finance to history, entertainment and many more. Follow him on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, LinkedIn, Pinterest and Tumblr. Contact Christian at powerwordsonlinewriting@gmail.com.

Monday, October 8, 2012

The Wealth of the Windsors: A Special Report on the Wealth of the British Royal Family

The British Royal Family is worth billions.  
The wealth of the Windsors remains a deep mystery that we could only speculate. A lot of reports surfaced that the Queen and the British Royal Family are worth billions, although clarifications have been made that much of the privileges enjoyed by Her Majesty, including living on palaces and castles such as Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle, using the Crown Jewels and hundreds of priceless paintings are held in trust for the state. She could use them but she could never sell them. But with or without these, Queen Elizabeth II is a very wealthy woman. In this article, we will take a deeper look at the fortune of one of the world’s richest families, based on different articles which we have gathered.


-->

Queen Elizabeth II
Estimated Wealth: $450 million to $100 billion and up

Queen Elizabeth II is worth anywhere from
a few centimillions to hundreds of billions. 
In 1991, The Sunday Times of London estimated that Queen Elizabeth II had assets worth $11 billion. In 1992, Guinness World Record wrote that she was “asserted by some to be the wealthiest woman,” although “a few of her assets under the perpetual succession of the Crown are either personal or disposable.”

In Oct. 2001, The Mail on Sunday ran a two-part Royal Rich Report which estimated the Queen’s wealth at nearly $2 billion, mainly broken down into the following: stocks and shares estimated at $800 million, $120 million on jewelry collection, including a diamond brooch worth nearly $42 million, stamp collections valued at $167 million, and fur coats that she never wears worth at $1.6 million.” This does not include her estates in Sandringham and Balmoral, which she owns personally, as well as “horses and a stud farm, wine, medals, a collection of classic cars and land.”

As early as 1962, estimates were being made on the actual wealth of the Queen. Jock Colville, the Queen’s former Private Secretary, then a banker, “made a statement in The Timesin which he said that the Queen was worth £12 million,” writes Sarah Bedford in Elizabeth: A Biography of Her Majesty The Queen. Furthermore, “The Lord Chamberlain announced that the Queen’s cash fortune was less than £100 million,” that was in 1993.


In 2012, financial firm Wealth-X estimates Her Majesty to be worth $510 million.

The Queen also receives Parliamentary annuities, around $13 million, to pay for the cost of running her staff. The Queen also enjoys the income from the Duchy of Lancaster, an ancient estate made up of lands across the country and stock market investments. As of 2012, the Duchy has a market value of $600 million.

“Not included are those assets belonging to the Crown Estate,” writes Forbes, “which she gets to enjoy as Queen, such as $10 billion worth of real estate, Buckingham Palace (estimated to be worth another $5 billion), the Royal Art collection, and unmarked swans on stretches of the Thames. The Crown has claimed ownership of these birds since the 12th century when swan meat was considered a delicacy; they are no longer eaten.”

However, the Almanach de Gotha is more generous in assessing Her Majesty’s wealth. As the leading authority when it comes to royalty, the Almanach puts the Queen’s wealth north of $100 billion, claiming that as sovereign, the Crown Estates, royal palaces, Crown Jewels, etc., are legally hers. This makes not only the richest monarch, but also the richest person in the world. 

Almach de Gotha further claims that “there are no such documents in existence to proof this false view [that she cannot dispose the properties traditionally considered held in trust for the State]and as such they are owned, borne and enjoyed as hereditary possessions of the Reigning Sovereign, thus can be legally viewed as personal property of the British Sovereign, being owned and enjoyed under their inalienable rights as Monarch of the Realm.”

She's also the largest landowner in the world, because technically she owns the whole of United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and other lesser known domains across the seas. 

The Queen’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012 marks her 60 years on the throne, with celebrations throughout her realms.

Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
Estimated Wealth: $45 million

Prince Philip is worth $45 million
Mail on Sunday writes: “Philip is the only royal during the Queen's reign who has been allowed personally to save money from his Civil List payments. His original annuity was intended to give him enough not only for official expenses, but also to put some aside for his retirement. This is no longer the case, but Philip may have some small private savings as a result of the earlier arrangement."

The Prince also “receives £359,000 (around $600,000) a year to cover official expenses, and does not spend it all. By last year (2000) he had saved £335,000. Any savings today do not go into his private purse. They are held by a surplus fund for future years as a buffer against inflation.”

The Prince was notorious for his penny-pinching habits. Once on an official visit to South Africa, he made headlines after he turned down a $230 a-night penthouse suite in exchange for a $47a-night single room. The Prince though has an art collection valued at $5 million, some of which he bought for a few shillings in the 1950s.

Prince Charles
Estimated Wealth:  $200-500 million

Much of Prince Charles' wealth are derived
from the Duchy of Cornwall.
Prince Charles is the richest person in the Royal Family aside from the Queen, although he derives much of his income, and wealth from the Duchy of Cornwall, valued at more than $1 billion, with an annual profit of $27 million. The Duchy owns his country home in Gloucestershire, most of his cars and even the pen he writes with. The Duchy however is held in trust for succeeding princes of Wales, so he cannot liquidate its assets. Although there are those who say the Duchy does not really belong to Charles. But until he accedes to the Throne, the 144,000-acre estate, which covers properties from the Oval cricket ground in London to Dartmoor prison and smallholdings in Devon, is run solely for his benefit and his profit, so we have included it in his wealth.

In October 2012, financial accounts from the Duchy of Cornwall reveals that, since 2007, the Prince had inherited an accumulated amount worth $2 million from the estates of the duchy's residents who died without a will as stipulated by a medieval law. In 2011 alone, the Prince enjoyed  $800,000. 

Prince William, Duke of Cambridge
Estimated Wealth: $25 million

Prince William, photographed here with his wife,
Kate, enjoys millions from his parents' estates,
as well as from the trust fund established
by the late Queen Mother.
Prince William, who turned 30 this year, received a substantial inheritance from the late Princess Diana’s estate, amounting to as much as $17 million. When he turned 21, he became recipient of the $3 million trust left by the Queen Mother, and another  $4 million trust fund, which continues to multiply in value, awaits him when he turns 40. The prince is also expected to inherit the substantial income from the Duchy of Cornwall when he succeeds as heir apparent once Prince Charles becomes kind.

Prince Harry
Estimated Wealth: $16 million

Prince Harry can live off a good life with his trust funds
worth millions.
Although not as well-endowed as his elder brother, this zesty royal hunk still enjoys a substantial wealth, given that Princess Diana had split her estate evenly between her two sons. He is set to inherit his millions when he turns 30, just like his brother. We estimate that to be around $30 million when he reaches that age. The Queen Mother also left him with a substantial chunk of inheritance. “Funds with initial investments of £6.9 million ($11 million) were set up for Harry and, with interest, are now worth at least £10 million ($17 million). Prince Charles is reputed to have set aside for his sons money which must now be worth 8 million. It is likely that Harry has the larger portion of this,” writes Mail on Sunday.

Prince Andrew, Duke of York
Estimated Wealth: $75 million

The prince draws his wealth from a trust fund set up for him when he was still a child, plus substantial investments on businesses and properties. The Prince also receives an “annual personal allowance from the Queen in addition to the fixed £249,000-a-year annuity (that's around $415,000) he gets to cover costs such as staff salaries, which the Queen also pays.”

Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie
Estimated Wealth: $5-6 million each

Prince Andrew’s daughters became instant millionaires in 1996, after their parents’ divorce settlement awarded them with roughly $3 million trust fund. In 1994, the Queen Mother established a $3 million-pound trust fund for each of the sisters.  

Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex
Estimated Wealth: $40 million

Despite the recent financial losses incurred by the prince after his production company ceased from operations, as well as after his wife, Sophie, Countess of Wessex, withdrew from her lucrative PR career to focus on their official duties, the couple still has sufficient millions to provide them a comfortable lifestyle. The Prince receives $235,000 from the Queen and the couple’s wealth is drawn primarily from their home, Edward's trust funds and valuable furnishings in Bagshot, their official residence, much of which were received as wedding presents.

Anne, Princess Royal
Estimated wealth: $30 million

The most frugal of the Queen’s children, Princess Anne, the Princess Royal, is the beneficiary of a trust fund set up by her grandfather, George VI, added to by the Queen and Prince Philip and reported to be worth around $2 million pounds when she was still a child. The Princess' wealth also came from valuable gifts she received during her wedding to Capt. Mark Phillips, including fabulous jewelry, valued at $1 million in 1976. With inflation, they are worth at least $10 million, although a considerable portion went to Mark on their divorce. The biggest present was her home, Gatcombe Park in Gloucestershire, bought for her by the Queen and now worth about $15 million and she has jewelries worth $7 million. The Princess also receives roughly $380,000 in annuity to cover the cost of her official duties. 

Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester
Estimated wealth:  $25 million

As the sole surviving child of the late Duke and Duchess of Gloucester, and the principal heir of the late Princess Marie Louise, Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, and his wife, Danish-born Birgitte own valuable collection of jewels worth $13 million, rare books and other heirlooms worth about $6 million pounds and their $17 million-pound country estate. Nevertheless, the couple still cries poor.  In 2005, the Duke auctioned some of the family heirlooms to pay the death duties of the late Princess Alice. The auction realized around $2 million. The Duke receives nearly $300,000 a year from the Queen to cover his royal expenses and staff and pulls in $100,000 from the tenants of Barnwell Manor.

Prince Edward, Duke of Kent
Estimated wealth: $10-15 million

Claiming to be the poorest among the royals, at least by their standard, the Duke of Kent and his family are still worth around at least $10 million, not to mention the privileges accorded to being a royal, including gifts, free holidays, grace-and-favor housing and free travel on official duties. The Duke also receives almost $400,000 pounds a year for carrying out official royal duties, as well as a small Army pension. The family’s wealth was tied to jewelries, estimated at $14 million. In 2006, the Duke and his siblings, Prince Michael and Princess Alexandra, enjoyed a windfall after making $3.5 million from the auction of some family  heirlooms.

Prince and Princess Michael of Kent
Estimated wealth: $8-10 million pounds

Dubbed as the "Rent-a-Kent" for their numerous commercial ventures—often bordering to the controversial side—the couple are the only members of the Royal Family that do not receive money from the Queen and do not perform any official royal duties. The Prince earns his keep from his own consultancy firm, Cantium Services, who, after several years of losses, posted profits worth $100,000 pounds. The company is currently valued at $500,000. The Princess meanwhile, earns more by writing books, providing lectures, and running her own interior design company, Szapar Designs. After being forced to pay or vacate their grace-and-favor apartment at Kensington Palace, the couple, who were crying poverty,  sold their Gloucestershire country home for nearly $10 million, while the $3.5 million-sale of their parents’ personal effects provided some extra cash.

Princess Alexandra
Estimate wealth: $18-20 million pounds

Princess Alexandra, a well-loved member of the Royal Family, derives much of her wealth from the inheritance she got from her husband, Sir Angus Ogilvy, who was a shrewd business until the Lonrho Affair forced him out from several corporate directorships. The Princess receives $375,000 pounds a year to pay for her official expenses. She also owns heirlooms, an art collection worth $6 million, and magnificent jewelries estimated at $15 million.

NOTE: for conversion purposes, as of today, 1 pound is roughly 0.6 dollars. 


About the Author

Christian George Acevedo is a book worm, mentor, and scholar of wide-ranging interests. He has authored hundreds of articles for various websites, and his expertise ranges from online marketing and finance to history, entertainment and many more. Follow him on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, LinkedIn, Pinterest and Tumblr. Contact Christian at powerwordsonlinewriting@gmail.com.

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Royal Finances: The Queen is more value-for-money than republican presidents

The Queen, more value for money than a president
The issue about royal finances has been the subject of never-ending arguments. Republicans and royalophobes have pointed out many times over that The British Royal Family is a complete set of trash and should be abolished. They're expensive and doesn't cost a cent to the British people. They're impractical and so they should be phased out.


But is it really true? I conducted a little research and have found out that maintaining a "royal" figurehead on top of the government is more value for money than electing a president.

I have found out that in 2011, the United States president is more expensive than the Queen of England, while the total budget of the British monarchy for the same year was a little over $40 mn. This includes the salaries paid for the members of the Royal Family, officials and staff, travel and maintenance of the Royal residences. Meanwhile, Barack Obama enjoyed $71.3 mn, which included his "basic" salary and allowances, that of his first lady and family, officials and staff, and operating expenses and maintenance of White House. The budget doesnt include payment for the king's travels, etc. 

Now come to think of this. Who draws more crowd? The Queen or President Obama. I bet there'd be more people wanting to rub elbows with The Queen than pay a courtesy call with the American President. Americans themselves are the keenest to go to England. Ask their itinerary and visiting Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, or taking a glimpse of The Queen will surely pop up their mind.

Now, who's the real value for money?